Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video539 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oval Office Interview results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 42.5% saturation with 916 hits. Analysis detected 2,706 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,156 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (3,988 of 16,562 topics). This Oval Office Interview is worse (more manipulative) than 75.90% of the peer group.
Oval Office Interview
Topic details
Total words: 2,156
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

76% percentile
025507510075.9% percentile
5.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 42.5%42.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 30.3%30.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.2%7.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.3%2.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 42.5%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 30.3%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Red Herring: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.1%Straw Man: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.9%Horn Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos