Author summary
⁠0%8 analyzed articles/videos2,792 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ewan Palmer results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25.4% saturation with 4,093 hits. Analysis detected 22,706 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,107 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (2,613 of 6,498 authors). This Ewan Palmer is worse (more manipulative) than 59.80% of the peer group.
Ewan Palmer
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠60%Ewan Palmer (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 16,107
Article count: 8
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

60% percentile
025507510059.8% percentile
3.0% BS Score8 analyzed articles16.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 10.7%10.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.7%4.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 15.8%15.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.7%4.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 25.4%25.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.1%3.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.5%0.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 6.0%6.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 10.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 25.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Author 7.4%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 6.0%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Author 5.0%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Burden of Proof: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.4%Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate