Trump, 80, Humiliated With His Own Dance After U.S. World Cup Loss 47%

By Cameron Adams0%

7/7/2026, 1:57:16 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Anecdotal, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 25.9% saturation with 138 hits. Analysis detected 1,459 faulty-reasoning hits from 532 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 48.3% and a BS Rank of 47% (11,788 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 53.90% of the article peer group.

Donald Trump has been personally trolled on U.S. soil by the team that ended America’s World Cup assault. 
The 80-year-old president personally intervened after Team USA superstar Folarin Balogun was handed a red card that ruled him out of Monday’s knockout game against Belgium , played in Seattle. 
After Trump contacted FIFA President Gianni Infantino, who invented a Peace Prize for Trump last year after he was snubbed by the Nobel committee, the suspension was dramatically overturned. 
It is the first time since 1962 that FIFA had overturned a suspension in the World Cup and led to accusations of political interference and corruption. 
However, despite Balogun being controversially cleared to play, the American team was soundly beaten, 4-1. 
Footage widely posted on X shows Belgium striker Romelu Lukaku leading his team to imitate Trump’s awkward dance style after he scored the final goal in the match. 
The players formed a circle on the sideline and pumped their fists in and out, while keeping their feet planted on the ground, in a brief victory dance to reference the U.S. president. 
Trump’s dance routine involves keeping the feet stationary while clenching the fist and swaying the hips side to side. 
He most frequently busts the move to the Village People’s “YMCA.” 
The Belgian soccer federation had expressed its fury at the “incomprehensible and unjustifiable” decision and the Red Devils’ social media team joined in the trolling with a post on X showing Lukaku celebrating his goal and the caption: “Overturn this.” 
# 
The president was also mocked by his estranged niece Mary after the World Cup loss, as the term “Trump curse” began trending on X. 
“The best US men’s team ever loses to Belgium,” Mary posted on X. 
“If they’d advanced, there would have been an asterisk next to their victory because of Donald’s interference.” 
She added, “He casts a shadow over everything. 
He can only win if he cheats, and he thinks that applies to everybody else.” 
She ended her post by imitating her uncle’s regular sign-off: “Sad.” 
<i>Morning Joe</i> co-host Jonathan Lemire wrote after the loss, “It’s as if Belgium had motivation to humiliate the U.S. tonight.” 
Progressive news outlet Meidas Touch also highlighted the “Trump curse.” 
“Sports fans are calling it the Trump curse,” the outlet claimed, before listing the connection between sporting events Trump attended where a team he either supported or predicted would win actually lost, from the Super Bowl to the NBA finals. 
Trump did not attend Monday’s game in Seattle, and was headed for a NATO summit in Turkey. 
Speaking after the game, U.S. coach Mauricio Pochettino said the team did not approach the match as they had other games in the World Cup. 
He also admitted, “We were never in the game.” 
“Everyone saw from the beginning that we did not connect with the game. 
We were never in the game,” he said. 
“It was really tough from the beginning,” said Pochettino. 
“I congratulate Belgium. 
They were better than us. 
It wasn’t our day.” 
Trump is yet to comment on the U.S. loss. 
The Daily Beast has contacted the White House for comment. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 21.6%Cameron Adams: 4.8%The Daily Beast: 4.5%Confirmation Bias21.6%This article: 0.0%Cameron Adams: 0.3%The Daily Beast: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 20.3%Cameron Adams: 4.7%The Daily Beast: 3.6%Availability Heuristic20.3%This article: 0.0%Cameron Adams: 0.5%The Daily Beast: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Adams: 0.3%The Daily Beast: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Adams: 4.6%The Daily Beast: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 23.9%Cameron Adams: 8.2%The Daily Beast: 11.2%Framing Effect23.9%This article: 0.0%Cameron Adams: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.1%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Adams: 0.1%The Daily Beast: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Adams: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.8%Cameron Adams: 3.8%The Daily Beast: 1.2%Optimism Bias0.8%This article: 7.3%Cameron Adams: 1.5%The Daily Beast: 1.3%Pessimism Bias7.3%This article: 23.5%Cameron Adams: 10.6%The Daily Beast: 19.9%Negativity Bias23.5%This article: 7.1%Cameron Adams: 3.5%The Daily Beast: 2.2%Self-Serving Bias7.1%This article: 0.0%Cameron Adams: 0.9%The Daily Beast: 2.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 3.8%Cameron Adams: 0.2%The Daily Beast: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias3.8%This article: 0.0%Cameron Adams: 1.1%The Daily Beast: 1.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Adams: 0.2%The Daily Beast: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Adams: 0.7%The Daily Beast: 1.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Adams: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 1.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Adams: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.5%Cameron Adams: 1.4%The Daily Beast: 1.4%Recency Bias4.5%This article: 0.0%Cameron Adams: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Adams: 0.5%The Daily Beast: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Adams: 2.8%The Daily Beast: 5.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Adams: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 4.9%Cameron Adams: 2.0%The Daily Beast: 3.2%Appeal to Authority4.9%This article: 2.8%Cameron Adams: 0.5%The Daily Beast: 1.1%False Dilemma2.8%This article: 0.0%Cameron Adams: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Adams: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 16.9%Cameron Adams: 3.2%The Daily Beast: 6.4%Hasty Generalization16.9%This article: 0.0%Cameron Adams: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 1.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 13.9%Cameron Adams: 2.4%The Daily Beast: 0.7%Bandwagon13.9%This article: 11.1%Cameron Adams: 6.1%The Daily Beast: 5.9%Appeal to Emotion11.1%This article: 6.0%Cameron Adams: 0.9%The Daily Beast: 1.0%Begging the Question6.0%This article: 5.5%Cameron Adams: 4.9%The Daily Beast: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.5%This article: 0.0%Cameron Adams: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.4%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Adams: 1.6%The Daily Beast: 1.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Adams: 0.1%The Daily Beast: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Adams: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 22.4%Cameron Adams: 3.0%The Daily Beast: 3.8%Anecdotal22.4%This article: 0.0%Cameron Adams: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 13.2%Cameron Adams: 3.0%The Daily Beast: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)13.2%This article: 0.0%Cameron Adams: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Adams: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Adams: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Adams: 0.1%The Daily Beast: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Adams: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 21.2%Cameron Adams: 12.4%The Daily Beast: 4.6%Unattributed Quote21.2%This article: 11.3%Cameron Adams: 3.8%The Daily Beast: 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection11.3%This article: 25.9%Cameron Adams: 14.6%The Daily Beast: 18.3%Biased Writer Voice25.9%This article: 0.0%Cameron Adams: 0.5%The Daily Beast: 0.8%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 6.4%Cameron Adams: 5.5%The Daily Beast: 3.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias6.4%This article: 0.0%Cameron Adams: 0.7%The Daily Beast: 0.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Adams: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

532 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers41%attributed speech312writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageMary • 13 words • 0.0% coverageMary • 17 words • 0.0% coverageMary • 8 words • 0.0% coverageMary • 15 words • 0.0% coverageMary • 11 words • 100.0% coverageJonathan Lemire • 20 words • 100.0% coverageMeidas Touch • 10 words • 100.0% coverageMeidas Touch • 40 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageMauricio Pochettino • 25 words • 0.0% coverageMauricio Pochettino • 9 words • 0.0% coverageMauricio Pochettino • 13 words • 0.0% coverageMauricio Pochettino • 8 words • 0.0% coverageMauricio Pochettino • 9 words • 0.0% coverageMauricio Pochettino • 3 words • 0.0% coverageMauricio Pochettino • 5 words • 0.0% coverageMauricio Pochettino • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageDaily Beast • 10 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Meidas Touch

100%flagged-word coverage
50 attributed words23% of attributed speech84% writer coverage
0%40.0%80.0%Unattributed Quote+56.6 ptsWriter: 23.4%Meidas Touch: 80.0%80.0%Biased Writer Voice-40.7 ptsWriter: 40.7%Meidas Touch: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B+12.3 ptsWriter: 7.7%Meidas Touch: 20.0%20.0%Quote-first Misdirection-12.8 ptsWriter: 12.8%Meidas Touch: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.