Keyword summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,431 analyzed words
BS Summary: These World-Cup results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 723 hits. Analysis detected 6,064 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,724 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 52% (17,255 of 35,713 keywords). This World-Cup is worse (more manipulative) than 51.70% of the peer group.
World-Cup
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
52%World-Cup (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

52% percentile
025507510051.7% percentile
2.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 12.0%12.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.6%11.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 12.6%12.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate