Author summary
23%3 analyzed articles/videos1,365 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kailyn Brown results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Optimism Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 501 hits. Analysis detected 4,676 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,603 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 46% (3,448 of 6,362 authors). This Kailyn Brown is better (less manipulative) than 54.20% of the peer group.
Kailyn Brown
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
46%Kailyn Brown (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,603
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

46% percentile
025507510045.8% percentile
2.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.5%4.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.6%1.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 7.8%7.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.2%3.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 5.9%5.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 3.5%3.5%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 8.9%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Author 7.8%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.9%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate