Author summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Deborah Netburn results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.2% saturation with 573 hits. Analysis detected 4,286 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,704 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 6,246 authors). This Deborah Netburn is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Deborah Netburn
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Deborah Netburn (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 2,704
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 21.2%21.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.3%5.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 20.3%20.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 16.0%16.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 9.8%9.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.4%2.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 8.3%8.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 10.7%10.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 10.1%10.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 16.0%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 21.2%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Author 20.3%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Author 10.1%, sitewide 6.9%Indoctrination: Author 9.8%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 9.1%, sitewide 9.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 8.3%, sitewide 0.5%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Author 4.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos