Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Marques Harper results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, In-Group Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 36.6% saturation with 334 hits. Analysis detected 1,813 faulty-reasoning hits from 912 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 6,427 authors). This Marques Harper is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Marques Harper
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Marques Harper (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 912
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles912 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 36.6%36.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 19.6%19.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 22.6%22.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 10.1%10.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 15.3%15.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 20.1%20.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.9%2.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 11.1%11.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 4.6%4.6%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Author 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Hasty Generalization: Author 36.6%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Author 10.1%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 22.6%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Author 20.1%, sitewide 6.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 19.6%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Emotion: Author 16.8%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Author 15.3%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Author 11.1%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 10.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 6.1%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos