Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 544 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jeanette Marantos results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Recency Bias , with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 21% saturation with 420 hits . Analysis detected 3,357 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,000 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.7% and a BS Rank of 90% (688 of 6,628 authors). This Jeanette Marantos is worse (more manipulative) than 89.60% of the peer group. Jeanette Marantos
Author details
Total words: 2,000
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
90% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 89.6% percentile 6.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.8% 7.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 21.0% 21.0% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 12.9% 12.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 17.8% 17.8% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.2% 8.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 7.0% 7.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.9% 13.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.3% 10.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 8.2% 8.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.8%, sitewide 26.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 21.0%, sitewide 9.1% Negativity Bias: Author 13.9%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 17.8%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.2%, sitewide 15.9% Recency Bias: Author 12.9%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.5%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.3%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 6.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 8.9%, sitewide 0.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 4.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% Indoctrination: Author 7.0%, sitewide 0.0% Halo Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst