Author summary
63% 4 analyzed articles/videos 4,402 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iris Kwok results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Availability Heuristic , and Appeal to Authority , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 1,018 hits . Analysis detected 12,776 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,520 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 24% (4,904 of 6,382 authors). This Iris Kwok is better (less manipulative) than 76.80% of the peer group. Iris Kwok
Author details
Total words: 16,520
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.2% percentile 1.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles16.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.9% 5.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.8% 3.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.3% 5.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.5% 5.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 6.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.7% Ad Hominem: Author 0.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst