Author summary
49%3 analyzed articles/videos3,137 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jaclyn Cosgrove results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 903 hits. Analysis detected 8,385 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,400 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 37% (4,158 of 6,592 authors). This Jaclyn Cosgrove is better (less manipulative) than 63.10% of the peer group.
Jaclyn Cosgrove
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
37%Jaclyn Cosgrove (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 10,400
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

37% percentile
025507510036.9% percentile
2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.3%4.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.7%8.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.5%3.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.0%2.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 4.7%4.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.4%3.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Author 8.1%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.7%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate