Author summary
40% 6 analyzed articles/videos 902 analyzed words
BS Summary: These FOX 5 Atlanta Digital Team results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 310 hits . Analysis detected 2,445 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,924 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 33% (4,170 of 6,218 authors). This FOX 5 Atlanta Digital Team is better (less manipulative) than 67.10% of the peer group. FOX 5 Atlanta Digital Team
Author details
Total words: 3,924
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.9% percentile 2.1% BS Score6 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.9% 7.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.3% 2.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst