Publication summary
50% 22 analyzed articles/videos 2,914 analyzed words
BS Summary: These FOX 5 Atlanta results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 1,190 hits . Analysis detected 11,807 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,353 analyzed words across 22 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 42% (222 of 379 publications). This FOX 5 Atlanta is better (less manipulative) than 58.50% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 17,353
Article count: 22
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.5% percentile 1.7% BS Score22 analyzed articles17.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 5.6% 5.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 4.2% 4.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 4.0% 4.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 3.2% 3.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 3.9% 3.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 0.8% 0.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 6.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst