Author summary
⁠5%1 analyzed article/video113 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marc Teichner results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 36 hits. Analysis detected 72 faulty-reasoning hits from 339 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠91% (609 of 6,244 authors). This Marc Teichner is worse (more manipulative) than 90.30% of the peer group.
Marc Teichner
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠91%Marc Teichner (selected)8%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 339
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

90% percentile
025507510090.3% percentile
7.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles339 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.6%10.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 4.7%4.7%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Author 5.9%5.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Author 10.6%, sitewide 19.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.7%, sitewide 0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos