Author summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,083 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zoe Jung results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Optimism Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16% saturation with 692 hits. Analysis detected 5,063 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,332 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (1,941 of 6,171 authors). This Zoe Jung is worse (more manipulative) than 68.60% of the peer group.
Zoe Jung
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠69%Zoe Jung (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,332
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

69% percentile
025507510068.6% percentile
3.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.8%4.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 16.0%16.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.0%6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 8.1%8.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.3%0.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 5.6%5.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 10.2%10.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.3%6.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 16.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.3%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.2%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Author 9.9%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 8.1%, sitewide 0.5%Hasty Generalization: Author 8.0%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Author 5.6%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos