Publication summary
79% 108 analyzed articles/videos 44,035 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Blaze Media results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 24,127 hits . Analysis detected 271,854 faulty-reasoning hits from 227,094 analyzed words across 108 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 64% (151 of 410 publications). This Blaze Media is worse (more manipulative) than 63.30% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 227,094
Article count: 108
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.3% percentile 2.2% BS Score108 analyzed articles227.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 9.6% 9.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 9.8% 9.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 3.7% 3.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.1% 3.1% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Publication 7.0% 7.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 10.6% 10.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Publication 4.5% 4.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 9.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 9.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 8.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 10.6%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 8.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 5.6%, sitewide 7.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Publication 7.0%, sitewide 1.4% In-Group Bias: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Publication 4.5%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst