Author summary
92%1 analyzed article/video1,044 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Poulos results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Indoctrination, and Slippery Slope, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.3% saturation with 574 hits. Analysis detected 4,767 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,132 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 77% (1,588 of 6,628 authors). This James Poulos is worse (more manipulative) than 76.10% of the peer group.
James Poulos
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
77%James Poulos (selected)5%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,132
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

76% percentile
025507510076.1% percentile
4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.2%7.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.4%2.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 18.3%18.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 12.8%12.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Author 11.5%11.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 11.2%11.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 10.3%10.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 18.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 16.4%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Author 12.8%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Author 11.5%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 11.2%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%False Dilemma: Author 10.3%, sitewide 1.5%Hasty Generalization: Author 9.8%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Loss Aversion: Author 5.8%, sitewide 2.5%Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos