Author summary
16% 1 analyzed article/video 882 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Paul Sacca results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Indoctrination , and Self-Serving Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.7% saturation with 125 hits . Analysis detected 1,159 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,646 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 19% (5,368 of 6,628 authors). This Paul Sacca is better (less manipulative) than 81.00% of the peer group. Paul Sacca
Author details
Total words: 2,646
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.0% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.3% 2.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Appeal to Nature: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.2% False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst