Author summary
â 71% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,958 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mike Howell results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Indoctrination , and Hasty Generalization , with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 1,554 hits . Analysis detected 11,835 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,414 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of â 45% (3,445 of 6,211 authors). This Mike Howell is better (less manipulative) than 55.50% of the peer group. Mike Howell
Author details
Total words: 10,414
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.5% percentile 2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Politically Right Leaning⌠Sitewide 1.4% Author 14.9% 14.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 11.5% 11.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 11.6% 11.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 14.9%, sitewide 1.4% Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.6%, sitewide 5.3% Indoctrination: Author 11.5%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 3.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst