Author summary
54% 27 analyzed articles/videos 11,809 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Josh Marcus results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 6,111 hits . Analysis detected 48,908 faulty-reasoning hits from 53,027 analyzed words across 27 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 24% (4,712 of 6,135 authors). This Josh Marcus is better (less manipulative) than 76.80% of the peer group. Josh Marcus
Author details
Total words: 53,027
Article count: 27
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.2% percentile 1.8% BS Score27 analyzed articles53K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.3% 6.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.5% 11.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.2% 2.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.1%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst