Publication summary
44% 50 analyzed articles/videos 22,523 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Independent results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 11,338 hits . Analysis detected 100,007 faulty-reasoning hits from 114,398 analyzed words across 50 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 39% (243 of 398 publications). This The Independent is better (less manipulative) than 61.00% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 114,398
Article count: 50
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.0% percentile 1.6% BS Score50 analyzed articles114.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 6.1% 6.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 9.9% 9.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 3.6% 3.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.4% 3.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 4.1% 4.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 8.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 9.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 6.2%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst