Author summary
49%1 analyzed article/video379 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Holly Evans results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 136 hits. Analysis detected 922 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,137 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of 85% (943 of 6,170 authors). This Holly Evans is worse (more manipulative) than 84.70% of the peer group.
Holly Evans
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
85%Holly Evans (selected)6%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,137
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

85% percentile
025507510084.7% percentile
5.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.3%5.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 12.0%12.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 9.2%9.2%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Author 5.8%5.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.4%3.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 10.0%10.0%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Author 3.4%3.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 3.4%3.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 7.4%7.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.2%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Author 12.0%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Author 10.0%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Author 7.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 6.0%, sitewide 5.2%Red Herring: Author 5.8%, sitewide 0.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.7%, sitewide 5.3%Burden of Proof: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.4%Recency Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Composition/Division: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos