Author summary
â 54% 5 analyzed articles/videos 2,962 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maroosha Muzaffar results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.9% saturation with 1,987 hits . Analysis detected 10,853 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,519 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of â 45% (3,619 of 6,531 authors). This Maroosha Muzaffar is better (less manipulative) than 55.40% of the peer group. Maroosha Muzaffar
Author details
Total words: 12,519
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.6% percentile 2.4% BS Score5 analyzed articles12.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 15.9% 15.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 15.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst