Author summary
88% 1 analyzed article/video 912 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Helen Corbett results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Availability Heuristic , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.3% saturation with 500 hits . Analysis detected 3,321 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,736 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 79% (1,426 of 6,540 authors). This Helen Corbett is worse (more manipulative) than 78.20% of the peer group. Helen Corbett
Author details
Total words: 2,736
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
78% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 78.2% percentile 4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.7% 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.2% 4.2% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 5.3% 5.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 10.5% 10.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.7% 1.7% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 18.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 17.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 10.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.2%, sitewide 5.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.8%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.1% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst