Author summary
12%1 analyzed article/video529 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Steven Grattan results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 107 hits. Analysis detected 828 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,587 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 54% (2,888 of 6,169 authors). This Steven Grattan is worse (more manipulative) than 53.20% of the peer group.
Steven Grattan
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
54%Steven Grattan (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,587
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

53% percentile
025507510053.2% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.7%6.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.5%4.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.7%2.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.9%2.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.0%2.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 1.3%1.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 5.9%5.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.0%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos