Israel shared intelligence of new Iranian plot to kill Trump with US officials 55%

By Josh Marcus57%

7/9/2026, 5:47:27 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Representativeness Heuristic, and Recency Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22.5% saturation with 75 hits. Analysis detected 595 faulty-reasoning hits from 334 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 52.8% and a BS Rank of 55% (9,970 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 54.50% of the article peer group.

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences. 
Swipe for next article 
Israel reportedly shared intelligence with the U.S. about potential plans by Iran to kill President Donald Trump . 
The warning about the alleged plot, reported by The Wall Street Journal and CNN , comes amid growing tension between the U.S. and Israel over what the next phase of the Iran war and peace process should like. 
The Independent has contacted Iran’s mission to the United Nations and the Israeli embassy in Washington for comment. 
When asked about the alleged intelligence tip, the White House pointed to President Trump’s comments yesterday claiming that he was under threat from Iran. 
“They want to take out the U.S. leader  me,” Trump said. 
“I’m on whatever list. 
I saw this morning I’m on every single one of their lists. 
And so far, I guess I’ve been a bit lucky, but maybe that doesn’t last very long. 
These are evil, sick people. 
And we have to root out that cancer. 
That cancer. 
You know what you do? 
You’ve got to cut out cancer early. 
And that’s the way I feel.” 
The details of plot Israel had warned about were not immediately clear, CNN reported. 
Officials familiar with the intelligence dialogue told the broadcaster that the U.S. had not vetted the alleged Iranian plot and suggested the warning could be viewed as a tool to sway the Trump administration towards Israel’s perspective on the war. 
Iran has long vowed to avenge Qassem Soleimani , a top Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps general that Trump had killed in his first term, and the U.S. is once again at a heightened security posture as American and Iranian forces trade strikes across the Middle East. 
This is developing story. 
Please check back for updates... 
Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in Please refresh your browser to be logged in 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 15.6%Josh Marcus: 4.5%The Independent: 3.9%Confirmation Bias15.6%This article: 7.2%Josh Marcus: 0.9%The Independent: 1.2%Anchoring Bias7.2%This article: 5.4%Josh Marcus: 3.6%The Independent: 3.6%Availability Heuristic5.4%This article: 13.8%Josh Marcus: 0.7%The Independent: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic13.8%This article: 0.0%Josh Marcus: 0.4%The Independent: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Marcus: 2.1%The Independent: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 22.5%Josh Marcus: 8.9%The Independent: 7.9%Framing Effect22.5%This article: 0.0%Josh Marcus: 0.2%The Independent: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Marcus: 0.6%The Independent: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Marcus: 0.1%The Independent: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Marcus: 1.9%The Independent: 2.2%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 7.2%Josh Marcus: 1.4%The Independent: 1.3%Pessimism Bias7.2%This article: 8.7%Josh Marcus: 12.4%The Independent: 10.4%Negativity Bias8.7%This article: 1.8%Josh Marcus: 1.6%The Independent: 2.0%Self-Serving Bias1.8%This article: 0.0%Josh Marcus: 1.1%The Independent: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Marcus: 0.1%The Independent: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Marcus: 1.7%The Independent: 1.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Marcus: 0.7%The Independent: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Marcus: 0.9%The Independent: 2.5%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Marcus: 0.2%The Independent: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Marcus: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 13.8%Josh Marcus: 1.5%The Independent: 1.8%Recency Bias13.8%This article: 0.0%Josh Marcus: 0.4%The Independent: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Marcus: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 1.5%Josh Marcus: 2.5%The Independent: 1.7%Ad Hominem1.5%This article: 0.0%Josh Marcus: 0.3%The Independent: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 5.4%Josh Marcus: 3.6%The Independent: 3.6%Appeal to Authority5.4%This article: 0.0%Josh Marcus: 1.2%The Independent: 1.3%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 2.1%Josh Marcus: 1.0%The Independent: 0.6%Slippery Slope2.1%This article: 0.0%Josh Marcus: 0.1%The Independent: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Marcus: 4.1%The Independent: 4.0%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Marcus: 0.9%The Independent: 0.7%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Marcus: 0.4%The Independent: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 9.6%Josh Marcus: 7.9%The Independent: 6.1%Appeal to Emotion9.6%This article: 1.8%Josh Marcus: 0.9%The Independent: 1.0%Begging the Question1.8%This article: 13.8%Josh Marcus: 3.8%The Independent: 3.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)13.8%This article: 0.0%Josh Marcus: 0.4%The Independent: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Marcus: 1.1%The Independent: 0.9%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Marcus: 0.1%The Independent: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Marcus: 0.2%The Independent: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 3.6%Josh Marcus: 2.5%The Independent: 1.8%Anecdotal3.6%This article: 0.0%Josh Marcus: 0.1%The Independent: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Marcus: 1.6%The Independent: 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Marcus: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Marcus: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Marcus: 0.4%The Independent: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Marcus: 0.2%The Independent: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Marcus: 0.1%The Independent: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 9.9%Josh Marcus: 2.4%The Independent: 2.6%Unattributed Quote9.9%This article: 7.5%Josh Marcus: 2.6%The Independent: 2.0%Quote-first Misdirection7.5%This article: 1.5%Josh Marcus: 5.5%The Independent: 6.0%Biased Writer Voice1.5%This article: 13.5%Josh Marcus: 1.5%The Independent: 0.7%Indoctrination13.5%This article: 0.0%Josh Marcus: 1.6%The Independent: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Marcus: 1.0%The Independent: 0.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 12.3%Josh Marcus: 0.6%The Independent: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…12.3%

334 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers40%attributed speech200writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageThe Independent • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWhite House • 24 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 12 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 4 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 12 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 17 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 5 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 8 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 2 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 5 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 7 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 6 words • 0.0% coverageCNN • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 46 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Donald Trump

97%flagged-word coverage
78 attributed words58% of attributed speech98% writer coverage
0%22.5%45.0%Unattributed Quote+42.3 ptsWriter: 0.0%Donald Trump: 42.3%42.3%Attempt to Sell a Product -20.5 ptsWriter: 20.5%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-13.6 ptsWriter: 20.0%Donald Trump: 6.4%6.4%Quote-first Misdirection+8.9 ptsWriter: 6.5%Donald Trump: 15.4%15.4%Biased Writer Voice+6.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%Donald Trump: 6.4%6.4%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.