Author summary
0% 13 analyzed articles/videos 6,056 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Erin Keller results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 2,819 hits . Analysis detected 18,313 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,271 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 26% (4,659 of 6,258 authors). This Erin Keller is better (less manipulative) than 74.40% of the peer group. Erin Keller
Author details
Total words: 23,271
Article count: 13
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.6% percentile 1.9% BS Score13 analyzed articles23.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.1% 12.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.2% 5.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.6%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst