Keyword summary
0% 12 analyzed articles/videos 6,587 analyzed words
BS Summary: These White-House results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.7% saturation with 6,010 hits . Analysis detected 41,445 faulty-reasoning hits from 28,973 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 50% (17,322 of 34,040 keywords). This White-House is better (less manipulative) than 50.90% of the peer group. White-House
Keyword details
Total words: 28,973
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.1% percentile 2.9% BS Score12 analyzed articles29K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 17.9% 17.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 16.0% 16.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 16.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 20.7%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 17.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Horn Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst