Author summary
⁠45%1 analyzed article/video975 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iva Greene results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Confirmation Bias, and False Dilemma, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 282 hits. Analysis detected 2,499 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,925 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (3,000 of 6,170 authors). This Iva Greene is worse (more manipulative) than 51.40% of the peer group.
Iva Greene
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠52%Iva Greene (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,925
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

51% percentile
025507510051.4% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.4%6.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.7%4.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.6%9.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.4%3.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.5%1.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 6.5%6.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.3%0.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.7%0.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.1%1.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 8.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Author 6.5%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.0%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.4%Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos