Publication summary
22% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,174 analyzed words
BS Summary: These NaturalNews.com results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Optimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 529 hits . Analysis detected 5,432 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,721 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 49% (196 of 383 publications). This NaturalNews.com is better (less manipulative) than 51.00% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 7,721
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.0% percentile 1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 4.9% 4.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 4.7% 4.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.2% 1.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 0.1% 0.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 1.5% 1.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Publication 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 5.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 5.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst