Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Kai Nicol-Schwarz results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 28.7% saturation with 447 hits. Analysis detected 1,557 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,557 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,196 authors). This Kai Nicol-Schwarz is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Kai Nicol-Schwarz
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Kai Nicol-Schwarz (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 1,557
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 11.1%11.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 8.1%8.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.8%4.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.6%4.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.9%3.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 2.2%2.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 2.3%2.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 28.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 11.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Unattributed Quote: Author 8.1%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Slippery Slope: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos