Publication summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Penticton Herald results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Unattributed Quote, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 421 hits. Analysis detected 3,959 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,066 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 410 publications). This Penticton Herald is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Penticton Herald
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
0%WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta1%
1%Brookings1%
1%Capital B News1%
1%Spotlight Delaware1%
1%The Banner1%
99%Utah Hockey Club13%
100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
100%MS NOW Live Events26%
100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
100%NBC 6 South Florida33%
0%Penticton Herald (selected)0%
Publication details
Total words: 3,066
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 13.7%13.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 8.7%8.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Publication 11.1%11.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 3.9%3.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Publication 4.6%4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 11.7%11.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 7.0%7.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Publication 3.9%3.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Publication 1.8%1.8%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Publication 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 13.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 8.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 11.7%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Publication 11.1%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Authority: Publication 7.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Publication 7.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Publication 5.4%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 6.4%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Publication 5.2%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Publication 5.7%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 4.6%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Publication 4.5%, sitewide 1.7%Ad Hominem: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%Loss Aversion: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate

Analyzed articles and videos