Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos145 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Borders results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Hasty Generalization, and Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 3.1% saturation with 777 hits. Analysis detected 3,512 faulty-reasoning hits from 24,871 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.5% and a BS Rank of 0% (37,516 of 37,530 keywords). This Borders is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Borders
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Borders (selected)1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 24,871
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles24.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.1%Straw Man: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos