Author summary
0%5 analyzed articles/videos503 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Federalist Staff results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 43.1% saturation with 867 hits. Analysis detected 9,252 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,012 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 13.1% and a BS Rank of 97% (213 of 6,222 authors). This The Federalist Staff is worse (more manipulative) than 96.60% of the peer group.
The Federalist Staff
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
97%The Federalist Staff (selected)14%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,012
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

97% percentile
025507510096.6% percentile
13.1% BS Score5 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 42.3%42.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 43.1%43.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 27.1%27.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 30.5%30.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 39.3%39.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 19.8%19.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 26.1%26.1%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 21.6%21.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 34.2%34.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 13.1%13.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Hasty Generalization: Author 43.1%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 42.3%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Author 39.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 34.2%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Author 30.5%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Author 27.1%, sitewide 1.5%Framing Effect: Author 24.1%, sitewide 26.9%In-Group Bias: Author 26.1%, sitewide 6.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 21.6%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 19.8%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.4%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Author 13.1%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Author 13.0%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 12.6%, sitewide 1.9%Tu Quoque: Author 11.7%, sitewide 0.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 6.9%, sitewide 9.1%Begging the Question: Author 8.6%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 8.4%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Author 8.3%, sitewide 1.7%Straw Man: Author 8.0%, sitewide 0.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 7.3%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Author 6.8%, sitewide 0.4%No True Scotsman: Author 5.5%, sitewide 0.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateAuthor rate