Speaker summary
58% 24 analyzed articles/videos 1,698 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mike Lee results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , False Dilemma , and Indoctrination , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 257.434 hits . Analysis detected 3,961.291 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,698 analyzed words across 24 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 2% (27,827 of 28,364 speakers). This Mike Lee is better (less manipulative) than 98.10% of the peer group. Mike Lee
Speaker details
Total words: 1,698
Content count: 24
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.9% percentile 4.4% BS Score24 analyzed videos1.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 9.4% 9.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 4.0% 4.0% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 10.8% 10.8% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 9.0% 9.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 7.2% 7.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 3.3% 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 5.5% 5.5% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 5.5% 5.5% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 4.8% 4.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 11.1% False Dilemma: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 1.5% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 1.4% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 6.9% Indoctrination: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 5.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 1.1% Straw Man: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 0.9% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst