Author summary
40% 1 analyzed article/video 923 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christine Peterson results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 455 hits . Analysis detected 3,082 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,692 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 38% (4,128 of 6,628 authors). This Christine Peterson is better (less manipulative) than 62.30% of the peer group. Christine Peterson
Author details
Total words: 3,692
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.7% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.3% 9.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.3% 12.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.0% 9.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Slippery Slope: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst