Author summary
62% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,246 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Manney results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Negativity Bias , with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 1,243 hits . Analysis detected 8,691 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,720 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 42% (3,732 of 6,362 authors). This David Manney is better (less manipulative) than 58.70% of the peer group. David Manney
Author details
Total words: 8,720
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.3% percentile 2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.1% 10.1% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 14.3% 14.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.1% 6.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.4% 3.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.8% 0.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 14.3%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.3%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.0% Straw Man: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst