Publication summary
70%2 analyzed articles/videos1,246 analyzed words
BS Summary: These PJ Media results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 1,243 hits. Analysis detected 8,691 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,720 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 64% (145 of 398 publications). This PJ Media is worse (more manipulative) than 63.70% of the peer group.
PJ Media
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
0%WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta1%
1%Brookings1%
1%The Banner1%
1%FactCheck.org1%
1%@politifact1%
64%PJ Media (selected)3%
99%Utah Hockey Club13%
100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
100%MS NOW Live Events26%
100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
100%NBC 6 South Florida33%
Publication details
Total words: 8,720
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

64% percentile
025507510063.7% percentile
2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 10.1%10.1%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Publication 14.3%14.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 8.1%8.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 6.1%6.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 1.0%1.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Publication 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Publication 3.4%3.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Publication 0.8%0.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Publication 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 10.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 8.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Publication 14.3%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 8.3%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Publication 7.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Publication 6.0%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Straw Man: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate

Analyzed articles and videos