Author summary
56% 6 analyzed articles/videos 2,230 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Paul Bois results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Anecdotal , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 922 hits . Analysis detected 9,052 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,283 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 41% (3,917 of 6,543 authors). This Paul Bois is better (less manipulative) than 59.90% of the peer group. Paul Bois
Author details
Total words: 9,283
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.1% percentile 2.3% BS Score6 analyzed articles9.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.9% 9.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.9% 7.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 6.6%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.3%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Bandwagon: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst