Breitbart81%

Possible Hate Crime as Jewish, Asian Man Stabbed in New York City 39%

By Paul Bois56%

7/23/2026, 8:54:48 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 14 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Anecdotal, and Unattributed Quote, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 27.3% saturation with 114 hits. Analysis detected 754 faulty-reasoning hits from 417 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 44.5% and a BS Rank of 39% (13,411 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 61.30% of the article peer group.

A Jewish and an Asian man were stabbed in New York City on Thursday, which police have been investigating as a possible hate crime. 
The attack occurred on Central Park West this afternoon near Manhattan’s Upper West Side, per the New York Times. 
According to a law enforcement official with knowledge of the matter, the attacker walked up to the first man, Chok Sung, 57, on West 84th and Central Park West and stabbed him in the back. 
He then went to West 86th Street, the official said, where he approached another man, Yezhak Grunhaus, 50, and stabbed him once in the chest. 
Police officers responding to a 911 call about an assault in the area arrived on West 84th Street to find Mr. 
Sung conscious, but with a wound on his torso. 
Officers then discovered Mr. 
Grunhaus two blocks north. 
Both men were taken by emergency medical workers to Mount Sinai’s Morningside location, where they are expected to survive, the police said. 
Police arrested a person of interest on Thursday. 
The identity of the assailant has not yet been released. 
According to the New York Post, police are “investigating claims that the suspect said ‘Allah Akbar,’ meaning ‘God is the greatest’ in Arabic, before one of the attacks.” 
The Jewish victim, Yezhak Grunhaus, was wearing a yarmulke at the time of the attack, having previously left the synagogue at Central Park West and West 86th Street. 
“Nava Silton, who was speaking with the victim inside the Jewish Center on West 86th Street before the attack, said she ran out and spoke to two witnesses who heard the suspect say ‘Allah Akbar’ before the stabbing,” noted NY Post. 
As JNS reported last month, hate crimes against Jews have seen a staggering surge in New York City over the past year. 
“The New York City Police Department said that anti-Jewish hate crimes were up 70.8% in the city last month compared to May 2025,” noted the outlet. 
“It didn’t inform the public that, if it compared statistics from the months in a broader way, the increase was more than double that—150%.” 
“Under New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani, who overturned many of his predecessor’s executive orders protecting Jews and Israelis hours into his tenure, the city has twice changed the way it reports hate crimes after the Big Apple recorded a 182% increase in antisemitic hate crimes in Mamdani’s first month on the job,” it added. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 9.8%Paul Bois: 3.8%Breitbart: 4.5%Confirmation Bias9.8%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 0.5%Breitbart: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 21.8%Paul Bois: 3.0%Breitbart: 3.9%Availability Heuristic21.8%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 0.3%Breitbart: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 0.4%Breitbart: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 0.5%Breitbart: 3.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 27.3%Paul Bois: 9.9%Breitbart: 11.9%Framing Effect27.3%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 0.3%Breitbart: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 0.4%Breitbart: 3.6%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 0.1%Breitbart: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 8.2%Paul Bois: 7.9%Breitbart: 9.7%Negativity Bias8.2%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 2.7%Breitbart: 2.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 0.3%Breitbart: 1.3%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 6.7%Paul Bois: 2.4%Breitbart: 4.7%In-Group Bias6.7%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 0.3%Breitbart: 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 0.9%Breitbart: 3.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.2%Paul Bois: 2.4%Breitbart: 1.8%Recency Bias6.2%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 1.7%Breitbart: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 2.9%Breitbart: 2.9%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 1.1%Breitbart: 1.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 13.2%Paul Bois: 3.5%Breitbart: 4.2%Appeal to Authority13.2%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 0.9%Breitbart: 2.5%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 0.6%Breitbart: 1.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.3%Paul Bois: 4.1%Breitbart: 7.9%Hasty Generalization5.3%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 2.0%Breitbart: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 4.0%Breitbart: 1.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 6.1%Breitbart: 8.8%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 2.3%Breitbart: 1.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 13.2%Paul Bois: 3.4%Breitbart: 3.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)13.2%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 0.3%Breitbart: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 0.5%Breitbart: 1.0%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 0.6%Breitbart: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 16.5%Paul Bois: 6.6%Breitbart: 2.5%Anecdotal16.5%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 1.1%Breitbart: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 0.6%Breitbart: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 16.5%Paul Bois: 2.9%Breitbart: 2.8%Unattributed Quote16.5%This article: 16.5%Paul Bois: 3.3%Breitbart: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection16.5%This article: 6.2%Paul Bois: 6.3%Breitbart: 7.8%Biased Writer Voice6.2%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 1.0%Breitbart: 1.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 13.2%Paul Bois: 2.9%Breitbart: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias13.2%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 2.3%Breitbart: 7.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Bois: 0.3%Breitbart: 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

417 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers42%attributed speech243writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageNew York Post • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageNava Silton • 41 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageJNS • 26 words • 100.0% coverageJNS • 24 words • 0.0% coverageJNS • 55 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Nava Silton

100%flagged-word coverage
41 attributed words24% of attributed speech35% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Nava Silton: 100.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Nava Silton: 100.0%100.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.