Keyword summary
76% 71 analyzed articles/videos 45,066 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New-York-City results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 27,047 hits . Analysis detected 202,806 faulty-reasoning hits from 185,455 analyzed words across 71 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 26% (25,494 of 34,053 keywords). This New-York-City is better (less manipulative) than 74.90% of the peer group. New-York-City
Keyword details
Total words: 185,455
Article count: 71
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.1% percentile 2.0% BS Score71 analyzed articles185.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 14.6% 14.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.0% 11.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst