Newsday55%

Sgt. Angel S. Rampersad, of Queens, was third soldier killed in Iranian attack on U.S. base 30%

By Maureen Mullarkey34%

7/22/2026, 5:49:45 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 14 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 18.4% saturation with 69 hits. Analysis detected 456 faulty-reasoning hits from 375 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 40.1% and a BS Rank of 30% (15,315 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 70.00% of the article peer group.

An Army soldier from Queens has been identified as the third service member killed in an Iranian attack on a base in Jordan on Friday. 
Gov. 
Kathy Hochul announced on Wednesday that Sgt. 
Angel S. 
Rampersad, 28, of Ozone Park, was killed on the attack, bringing the death toll to 18 U.S. service members killed since the war began. 
"Today, New York mourns the loss of one of our own, Sgt. 
Angel S. 
Rampersad of Ozone Park, who is believed to have been killed in action while serving our nation on July 17," Hochul said in a statement early Wednesday. 
"My heart is with her family, loved ones and the soldiers who stood beside her as they grieve this unimaginable loss." 
On Monday, the Pentagon identified 1st Lt. 
Tyler James Feehan, 25, of Ewa Beach, Hawaii, and Pvt. 
Isabella Gonzales, 19, of Carrollton, Texas, as the two other soldiers who were killed in Jordan in Friday’s attacks, The Associated Press reported. 
The soldiers were killed by Iranian ballistic missile and drone attacks in the first troop deaths from direct Iranian fire since the opening days of the war. 
The Department of War announced on Tuesday that the incident is under investigation. 
Rampersad was previously announced as missing. 
Her status was updated to a Duty Status  Whereabouts Unknown and is believed to be deceased, the department website said. 
Rampersad was assigned to 1st Battalion, 57th Air Defense Artillery Regiment, 52nd Air Defense Artillery Brigade, 10th Army Air & Missile Defense Command, Ansbach, Germany. 
"Sgt. 
Rampersad lived a life of courage and selflessness. 
New York, and our nation, are safer because of brave Americans like her who answer the call to serve," Hochul continued in the statement. 
"May we honor her memory, remember her sacrifice and keep all who loved her in our prayers." 
The U.S. 
Army website said Rampersad enlisted in the Army in March 2019. 
Her awards include the Army Commendation Medal, the Army Achievement Medal with two Oak Leaf Clusters, the Army Good Conduct Medal, the National Defense Service Medal, and the Army Service Ribbon, according to the website. 
Check back for updates on this developing story. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 7.2%Maureen Mullarkey: 2.4%Newsday: 2.4%Confirmation Bias7.2%This article: 6.4%Maureen Mullarkey: 2.1%Newsday: 0.8%Anchoring Bias6.4%This article: 6.7%Maureen Mullarkey: 2.2%Newsday: 3.0%Availability Heuristic6.7%This article: 0.0%Maureen Mullarkey: 0.0%Newsday: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Maureen Mullarkey: 0.0%Newsday: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Maureen Mullarkey: 0.0%Newsday: 0.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 3.5%Maureen Mullarkey: 3.3%Newsday: 5.9%Framing Effect3.5%This article: 0.0%Maureen Mullarkey: 0.0%Newsday: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Maureen Mullarkey: 0.0%Newsday: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Maureen Mullarkey: 0.0%Newsday: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Maureen Mullarkey: 0.0%Newsday: 1.6%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 12.8%Maureen Mullarkey: 4.3%Newsday: 1.7%Pessimism Bias12.8%This article: 13.1%Maureen Mullarkey: 4.4%Newsday: 11.8%Negativity Bias13.1%This article: 0.0%Maureen Mullarkey: 0.0%Newsday: 1.3%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Maureen Mullarkey: 0.0%Newsday: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Maureen Mullarkey: 0.0%Newsday: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 6.4%Maureen Mullarkey: 4.3%Newsday: 0.9%In-Group Bias6.4%This article: 0.0%Maureen Mullarkey: 0.0%Newsday: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 2.1%Maureen Mullarkey: 2.1%Newsday: 0.6%Halo Effect2.1%This article: 0.0%Maureen Mullarkey: 0.0%Newsday: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Maureen Mullarkey: 0.0%Newsday: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Maureen Mullarkey: 0.0%Newsday: 2.1%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Maureen Mullarkey: 0.0%Newsday: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Maureen Mullarkey: 0.0%Newsday: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Maureen Mullarkey: 0.0%Newsday: 0.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Maureen Mullarkey: 0.0%Newsday: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 18.4%Maureen Mullarkey: 6.1%Newsday: 4.2%Appeal to Authority18.4%This article: 0.0%Maureen Mullarkey: 0.0%Newsday: 1.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Maureen Mullarkey: 0.0%Newsday: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Maureen Mullarkey: 0.0%Newsday: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Maureen Mullarkey: 0.0%Newsday: 2.7%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Maureen Mullarkey: 0.0%Newsday: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Maureen Mullarkey: 0.0%Newsday: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 13.3%Maureen Mullarkey: 17.4%Newsday: 4.6%Appeal to Emotion13.3%This article: 0.0%Maureen Mullarkey: 0.0%Newsday: 0.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 7.2%Maureen Mullarkey: 2.4%Newsday: 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)7.2%This article: 0.0%Maureen Mullarkey: 0.0%Newsday: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Maureen Mullarkey: 0.0%Newsday: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Maureen Mullarkey: 0.0%Newsday: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Maureen Mullarkey: 0.0%Newsday: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Maureen Mullarkey: 0.0%Newsday: 2.0%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Maureen Mullarkey: 0.0%Newsday: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 12.8%Maureen Mullarkey: 4.3%Newsday: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)12.8%This article: 0.0%Maureen Mullarkey: 0.0%Newsday: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Maureen Mullarkey: 0.0%Newsday: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Maureen Mullarkey: 0.0%Newsday: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Maureen Mullarkey: 0.0%Newsday: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Maureen Mullarkey: 0.0%Newsday: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Maureen Mullarkey: 0.0%Newsday: 2.3%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Maureen Mullarkey: 2.0%Newsday: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 9.6%Maureen Mullarkey: 3.2%Newsday: 3.3%Biased Writer Voice9.6%This article: 0.0%Maureen Mullarkey: 1.5%Newsday: 0.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Maureen Mullarkey: 0.0%Newsday: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Maureen Mullarkey: 0.0%Newsday: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.1%Maureen Mullarkey: 0.7%Newsday: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.1%

375 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers58%attributed speech156writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageKathy Hochul • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageKathy Hochul • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageKathy Hochul • 27 words • 0.0% coverageKathy Hochul • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageThe Associated Press • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageThe Department of War • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageThe Department of War • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageKathy Hochul • 8 words • 0.0% coverageKathy Hochul • 24 words • 100.0% coverageKathy Hochul • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageU.S. Army website • 11 words • 0.0% coverageU.S. Army website • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Kathy Hochul

94%flagged-word coverage
116 attributed words53% of attributed speech62% writer coverage
0%17.5%35.0%Biased Writer Voice+31.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Kathy Hochul: 31.0%31.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -5.1 ptsWriter: 5.1%Kathy Hochul: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.