Topic summary
⁠29%1 analyzed article/video375 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ozone Park Soldier Killed In Jordan Attack results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 17.4% saturation with 196 hits. Analysis detected 706 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,125 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (5,642 of 16,562 topics). This Ozone Park Soldier Killed In Jordan Attack is worse (more manipulative) than 65.90% of the peer group.
Ozone Park Soldier Killed In Jordan Attack
Topic details
Total words: 1,125
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

66% percentile
025507510065.9% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.4%4.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.1%6.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.3%4.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 17.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Indoctrination: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos