Author summary
33% 1 analyzed article/video 375 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maureen Mullarkey results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Negativity Bias , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 17.4% saturation with 196 hits . Analysis detected 706 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,125 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 74% (1,622 of 6,244 authors). This Maureen Mullarkey is worse (more manipulative) than 74.00% of the peer group. Maureen Mullarkey
Author details
Total words: 1,125
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
74% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 74.0% percentile 3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.4% 4.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.1% 6.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.1% 2.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 4.3% 4.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 17.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Indoctrination: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst