Publication summary
58% 16 analyzed articles/videos 7,893 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Newsday results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 3,511 hits . Analysis detected 19,328 faulty-reasoning hits from 29,187 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 23% (297 of 385 publications). This Newsday is better (less manipulative) than 77.10% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 29,187
Article count: 16
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.9% percentile 1.4% BS Score16 analyzed articles29.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 12.0% 12.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 4.5% 4.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 5.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 12.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst