Newsday55%

Islip hearing on proposed Muslim school for boys brings out overflow crowd of opponents 13%

By Bart Jones0%

7/21/2026, 6:06:26 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 12 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof, Fundamental Attribution Error, and Appeal to Authority, with Bandwagon as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 32 hits. Analysis detected 264 faulty-reasoning hits from 471 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 29.7% and a BS Rank of 13% (19,080 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 87.20% of the article peer group.

An overflow crowd of 600 people packed an Islip Town meeting hall Tuesday evening to protest a planned boarding school for Muslim boys in Bay Shore. 
The crowd filled all 500 seats in the auditorium at Islip Town Hall West, with another 100 lined up outside and unable to enter the Islip Town Zoning Board of Appeals meeting. 
The 13-acre property at issue on Saxon Avenue was sold by the Roman Catholic Montfort Missionaries in June for $5 million to a Muslim group based partly out of the Suleymaniye mosque in Dix Hills. 
"It’s going to disrupt the character of the neighborhood. 
It doesn’t fit, in," Pat Montanino, 70, of East Islip, told Newsday as she waited in the hallway to try to get into the packed auditorium. 
Opponents also said the school would increase traffic in the immediate vicinity. 
The Montforts founded the facility in 1926 as a minor seminary where teenage boys considering the priesthood lived and studied. 
The seminary closed in 1972 and had, in recent decades, served as a retreat house and a headquarters for the Montfort order. 
But a lawyer representing the group that plans to open the boarding school for Muslim boys rejected the residents’ concerns and said the property has the proper zoning. 
Besides, said attorney Samuel L. 
Bifulco, the existing building had operated as a boarding school for decades. 
Bifulco said the school, for grades 7 through 12, would house a maximum of 120 students and 20 staff members, including teachers. 
Another 10 teachers would commute, meaning a minimum of traffic, he said. 
Students "will participate in a structured educational environment that includes secular academic instruction, religious studies, and recreational programming," he told the Board of Appeals. 
He also said there will be no weddings or catered events at the facility. 
Some appeals board members strongly questioned Bifulco about how the project went through without a full public hearing. 
Steven Bertolino, an attorney representing residents, argued to the board that the new project should be rejected in part because town laws don’t allow a dormitory on the property. 
The Montforts said they sold the property because they could no longer afford to keep it as the number of their members dwindled. 
Previously, the order had an offer from Sunrise Senior Living to buy the property and construct an assisted living facility there, the Rev. 
Thomas Poth, provincial of the Montforts in the United States, told Newsday. 
Residents opposed the plan and the Islip Town Zoning Board ultimately rejected Sunrise’s application for a zoning change. 
The battle went on for eight years, Poth said Tuesday. 
"We had eight years to try to sell it and the town refused" to allow the Montforts "to sell it to Sunrise Senior," he said. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Bart Jones: 0.0%Newsday: 2.4%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bart Jones: 0.0%Newsday: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 2.5%Bart Jones: 0.8%Newsday: 3.0%Availability Heuristic2.5%This article: 0.0%Bart Jones: 0.0%Newsday: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Bart Jones: 0.0%Newsday: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bart Jones: 0.0%Newsday: 0.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 5.1%Bart Jones: 7.1%Newsday: 5.9%Framing Effect5.1%This article: 0.0%Bart Jones: 0.0%Newsday: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 1.9%Bart Jones: 3.1%Newsday: 0.5%Status Quo Bias1.9%This article: 5.3%Bart Jones: 1.8%Newsday: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect5.3%This article: 2.5%Bart Jones: 2.5%Newsday: 1.6%Optimism Bias2.5%This article: 0.0%Bart Jones: 0.0%Newsday: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 3.8%Bart Jones: 4.1%Newsday: 11.8%Negativity Bias3.8%This article: 4.9%Bart Jones: 3.4%Newsday: 1.3%Self-Serving Bias4.9%This article: 5.9%Bart Jones: 2.0%Newsday: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error5.9%This article: 0.0%Bart Jones: 0.0%Newsday: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bart Jones: 0.0%Newsday: 0.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bart Jones: 1.8%Newsday: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bart Jones: 0.0%Newsday: 0.6%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Bart Jones: 0.0%Newsday: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Bart Jones: 0.0%Newsday: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Bart Jones: 0.0%Newsday: 2.1%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bart Jones: 0.0%Newsday: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Bart Jones: 0.0%Newsday: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bart Jones: 0.0%Newsday: 0.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Bart Jones: 0.0%Newsday: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 5.9%Bart Jones: 2.0%Newsday: 4.2%Appeal to Authority5.9%This article: 0.0%Bart Jones: 0.0%Newsday: 1.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Bart Jones: 0.0%Newsday: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Bart Jones: 0.0%Newsday: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Bart Jones: 0.8%Newsday: 2.7%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Bart Jones: 0.0%Newsday: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 6.8%Bart Jones: 2.3%Newsday: 0.6%Bandwagon6.8%This article: 0.0%Bart Jones: 2.5%Newsday: 4.6%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Bart Jones: 0.0%Newsday: 0.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Bart Jones: 0.0%Newsday: 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Bart Jones: 0.0%Newsday: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 6.2%Bart Jones: 2.1%Newsday: 0.4%Burden of Proof6.2%This article: 0.0%Bart Jones: 0.0%Newsday: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Bart Jones: 0.0%Newsday: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Bart Jones: 0.0%Newsday: 2.0%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Bart Jones: 0.0%Newsday: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Bart Jones: 0.0%Newsday: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Bart Jones: 0.0%Newsday: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Bart Jones: 0.0%Newsday: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Bart Jones: 0.6%Newsday: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Bart Jones: 0.0%Newsday: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Bart Jones: 0.0%Newsday: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Bart Jones: 0.0%Newsday: 2.3%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Bart Jones: 0.6%Newsday: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Bart Jones: 0.0%Newsday: 3.3%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 5.1%Bart Jones: 1.7%Newsday: 0.5%Indoctrination5.1%This article: 0.0%Bart Jones: 0.0%Newsday: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bart Jones: 0.0%Newsday: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bart Jones: 0.0%Newsday: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

471 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers41%attributed speech276writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coveragePat Montanino • 9 words • 0.0% coveragePat Montanino • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageSamuel L. Bifulco • 12 words • 0.0% coverageSamuel L. Bifulco • 22 words • 0.0% coverageSamuel L. Bifulco • 12 words • 0.0% coverageSamuel L. Bifulco • 24 words • 100.0% coverageSamuel L. Bifulco • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageSteven Bertolino • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageThomas Poth • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageThomas Poth • 10 words • 0.0% coverageThomas Poth • 25 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Steven Bertolino

100%flagged-word coverage
29 attributed words15% of attributed speech37% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.