Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Bart Jones results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Status Quo Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 101 hits. Analysis detected 556 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,413 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,359 authors). This Bart Jones is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Bart Jones
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Bart Jones (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 1,413
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.2%7.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.1%4.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.5%2.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 1.7%1.7%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Author 2.0%2.0%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Author 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.1%Status Quo Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.4%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.3%Indoctrination: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%Personal Incredulity: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos