Newsday55%

He was fired by the White House right after being sworn in. Now a top federal prosecutor is suing 27%

By The Associated Press63%

7/21/2026, 9:32:15 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 13 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Negativity Bias, and Sunk Cost Effect, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 95 hits. Analysis detected 514 faulty-reasoning hits from 654 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 38.3% and a BS Rank of 27% (16,068 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 73.40% of the article peer group.

WASHINGTON  The top federal prosecutor in Seattle who was fired last week less than an hour after being sworn in sued over his termination Tuesday, teeing up a legal challenge to the Trump administration's efforts to install its own picks in the powerful Justice Department posts. 
Roger Rogoff is the latest in a series of judicially appointed U.S. attorneys to be ousted by the Trump administration from their posts but is believed to be the first of that group to sue over the removal. 
His action creates a court case that will test the Justice Department’s authority to appoint  and fire  prosecutors. 
Rogoff was unanimously appointed to the job of U.S. attorney for western Washington by the federal judges in the district. 
But shortly after he was sworn in last Wednesday, he received an email from the Trump administration informing him that President Donald Trump had ordered his termination. 
The lawsuit contends that the abrupt firing was unconstitutional and disregarded the authority of the judges of the district to name Rogoff to the job until the vacancy could be filled through a Senate-confirmed nominee. 
“The President’s actions violate the law, and they ignore the protections of the Constitution of the United States. 
Rogoff said in a statement issued through the law firm representing him. 
"His removal of me, like his removal of other court-appointed U.S. attorneys across the country, is illegal and cannot stand." 
US attorneys are typically nominated by the president 
U.S. attorneys, top federal prosecutors who oversee regional Justice Department outposts across the country, are typically nominated by the president and then confirmed by the Senate. 
In the case of a vacancy, attorneys general do have the authority to name an interim U.S. attorney who can serve for 120 days. 
When temporary appointments expire before a nominee is confirmed, the judges in a judicial district can name a U.S. attorney, as happened in Rogoff's case. 
But under Trump, the Justice Department has sought to leave unconfirmed prosecutors in their positions indefinitely or has moved to fire prosecutors appointed by the courts. 
The Justice Department said in a statement Tuesday that “the district court did not coordinate with DOJ on this selection. 
Consistent with other firings of this type, this is wholly within the President’s authority.” 
Even before Rogoff was fired, the lawsuit notes, acting Attorney General Todd Blanche signaled his intent to fire whomever the judges selected, noting that they did not have the president's support. 
Hours later, after he was fired, Blanche posted: “District court judges can appoint a temporary U.S. 
Attorney, and POTUS can fire them." 
Judges from the state's western district, he said, "abandoned the time-honored process of consultation with the administration so that the selected U.S. 
Attorney is qualified to serve in the administration. 
Roger Rogoff has been fired by the President." 
It's a district without a Senate-confirmed US attorney since 2023 
Rogoff's district has not had a Senate-confirmed U.S. attorney since 2023. 
Rogoff submitted his name for consideration with the federal bench last January after the judges signaled their intent to fill a vacancy created by the end of the 120-day term of Charles Neil Floyd, who had been named to the job last year by then-Attorney General Pam Bondi. 
Other jurisdictions that have seen tussles between the judiciary and the administration over the prosecution posts include New Jersey, where Trump's former personal lawyer, Alina Habb a, resigned in December after an appeals court said she had been serving in the post unlawfully. 
Lindsey Halligan, another of Trump's personal lawyers who was installed by the administration, left her position as an acting U.S. attorney in Virginia after a judge concluded her appointment was unlawful and that indictments she brought against New York Attorney General Letitia James and former FBI Director James Comey must be dismissed. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 2.8%Newsday: 2.4%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.4%Newsday: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 12.4%The Associated Press: 3.2%Newsday: 3.0%Availability Heuristic12.4%This article: 4.0%The Associated Press: 0.9%Newsday: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic4.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.6%Newsday: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.8%Newsday: 0.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 3.4%The Associated Press: 11.1%Newsday: 5.9%Framing Effect3.4%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.6%Newsday: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 1.5%The Associated Press: 0.7%Newsday: 0.5%Status Quo Bias1.5%This article: 7.3%The Associated Press: 0.1%Newsday: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect7.3%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 3.1%Newsday: 1.6%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 4.0%The Associated Press: 1.7%Newsday: 1.7%Pessimism Bias4.0%This article: 11.0%The Associated Press: 11.0%Newsday: 11.8%Negativity Bias11.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 2.2%Newsday: 1.3%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 4.7%The Associated Press: 1.2%Newsday: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error4.7%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.2%Newsday: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 2.2%Newsday: 0.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.0%Newsday: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.9%Newsday: 0.6%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Newsday: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.0%Newsday: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.6%The Associated Press: 2.0%Newsday: 2.1%Recency Bias6.6%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.4%Newsday: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Newsday: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.9%Newsday: 0.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.2%Newsday: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 3.8%Newsday: 4.2%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 4.0%The Associated Press: 1.2%Newsday: 1.0%False Dilemma4.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.8%Newsday: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Newsday: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 3.0%Newsday: 2.7%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.3%Newsday: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.5%Newsday: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 5.6%Newsday: 4.6%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.8%Newsday: 0.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 2.4%The Associated Press: 2.8%Newsday: 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)2.4%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Newsday: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.5%Newsday: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Newsday: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Newsday: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 14.5%The Associated Press: 1.3%Newsday: 2.0%Anecdotal14.5%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.0%Newsday: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.7%Newsday: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.0%Newsday: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Newsday: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Newsday: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.2%Newsday: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.2%Newsday: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.8%Newsday: 2.3%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 2.8%The Associated Press: 1.2%Newsday: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection2.8%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 3.9%Newsday: 3.3%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.7%Newsday: 0.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.8%Newsday: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.3%Newsday: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.4%Newsday: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

654 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers5.2%attributed speech620writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 47 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageRoger Rogoff • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageTodd Blanche • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageRoger Rogoff • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 48 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 52 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Roger Rogoff

71%flagged-word coverage
28 attributed words82% of attributed speech58% writer coverage
0%2.5%5.0%Quote-first Misdirection-2.9 ptsWriter: 2.9%Roger Rogoff: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.