Speaker summary
⁠39%5 analyzed articles/videos718 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Roger Rogoff results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 151 hits. Analysis detected 1,229.749 faulty-reasoning hits from 718 analyzed words across 5 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠2% (28,049 of 28,364 speakers). This Roger Rogoff is better (less manipulative) than 98.90% of the peer group.
Roger Rogoff
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

1% percentile
02550751001.1% percentile
3.6% BS Score5 analyzed videos718 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 7.7%7.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 6.1%6.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 10.1%10.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 2.4%2.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 7.7%7.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 3.8%3.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 2.4%2.4%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 4.4%4.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Primacy Effect: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%Burden of Proof: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 0.4%Begging the Question: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos