Author summary
85% 9 analyzed articles/videos 4,398 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Allison Detzel results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 30.4% saturation with 3,472 hits . Analysis detected 24,094 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,434 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 79% (1,408 of 6,611 authors). This Allison Detzel is worse (more manipulative) than 78.70% of the peer group. Allison Detzel
Author details
Total words: 11,434
Article count: 9
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
79% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 78.7% percentile 4.4% BS Score9 analyzed articles11.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 28.4% 28.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 23.1% 23.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.1% 6.1% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 6.6% 6.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 11.7% 11.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 12.1% 12.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 7.1% 7.1% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Author 4.8% 4.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 30.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 28.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 23.1%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 12.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 11.7%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.4%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 6.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 3.1% Halo Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.9%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.9%, sitewide 2.7% Straw Man: Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% Horn Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.0% Slippery Slope: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst