Topic summary
84% 34 analyzed articles/videos 17,877 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Justice Department results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 14,139 hits . Analysis detected 106,294 faulty-reasoning hits from 90,119 analyzed words across 33 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 31% (10,897 of 15,786 topics). This Justice Department is better (less manipulative) than 69.00% of the peer group. Justice Department
Topic details
Total words: 90,119
Article count: 33
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.0% percentile 2.2% BS Score33 analyzed articles90.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 13.3% 13.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 10.4% 10.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 15.7% 15.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 15.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.0% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst